The Price of Misaligned AI Risk Functions
AI risk doesn't belong to Security or Governance alone. It emerges at the boundary between them. Security teams see attack surfaces and incident response gaps. Governance teams see policy failures and compliance obligations. Both are looking at the same risk from opposite sides of an organizational wall, and the misalignment has a measurable cost.
83% of enterprises use AI tools. Fewer than 20% have mature governance in place. 47% of employees are using GenAI outside IT visibility. Prompt injection attempts grew 340% year-over-year. And organizations managing AI risk as two separate functions are paying for it.
Join us on June 23rd as Echelon Risk + Cyber and Cranium AI break down what's driving that gap, what it's costing you, and how to close it.
Our presenters will cover:
- Where most enterprises sit on the AI risk maturity curve and what adversaries are doing to exploit the gap
- Regulatory deadlines that are making the status quo untenable (EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001)
- Six diagnostic questions and a 90-day action roadmap to get your security and governance functions operating as one